Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

This is an excerpt from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read the full article, register.
Ranger’s ICO starts today and will run through January 10. In a nutshell, Ranger is a trading platform that has three main features.
Ranger is seeking at least $6 million in capital and is selling 39% of RNGR’s total assets in the ICO. Proceeds from the promotion will be held in a state controlled by investors, and the group receives a monthly income of $250,000. Ranger ICO marks an important milestone for MetaDAO: It is the first trading token on the platform to include a project with existing ICOs. The table below shows the distribution of RNGR.

ICO participants who receive a share will be 100% liquid in TGE (no vesting), while pre-ICO investors will follow a 24-month open plan without a mountain. Of course, the group allocation will be linked to the performance: Up to 7.6M RNGR (30% of the total resources) can be opened to the group through five tranches starting at 2x / 4x / 8x / 16x / 32x the ICO price. Each requirement must be maintained through a three-month TWAP, and there is a minimum cliff of 18 months before each group’s tokens unlock.
The chart below shows the opening schedule of RNGR. The team’s presentation is an estimate based on the above parameters, but the realized opening will depend on the fixed RNGR prices after the ICO.

MetaDAO’s last six ICOs were oversubscribed, and shares were set accordingly. The distribution system favors the whales, who can go beyond money to get the necessary share. As the chart below shows, in the last six ICOs of MetaDAO, participants have received approximately ~5% of the proposed form.

Ranger will confirm the points holders to enter the ICO through a dedicated container, and manage the above. I’m a firm believer in this design: It rewards early adopters and contributors through likes instead of giving away 10-30% of products via airdrop, which can lead to unnecessary sales and poor ranking. In this case, any share that is not taken by the point holders will roll over and vote for the ICO buyers.
Although the Ranger ICO is compelling on its own (and probably deserves participation, especially for policy holders), the main issue, in my opinion, is what it means for MetaDAO: a catalyst that can speed up the cadence and start-of-the-year investment.
MetaDAO monetizes ICOs through exchanges on its Futarchy AMM and its LP platform on Meteora. Futarchy AMM charges a fee of 0.5% for the volume, which is initially divided equally between MetaDAO and the project upgrade (for example, 0.25% to MetaDAO, 0.25% to Ranger). On Dec. 28, after consensus with the parties, the distribution was adjusted so that 0.5% of the total went to MetaDAO.
Ever since Futarchy AMM came into being on Oct. 10, 2025, MetaDAO has raised $2.4 million, with approximately 60% coming from Futarchy AMM and 40% from its Meteora LP portfolio.

That said, MetaDAO’s revenue has fallen significantly since mid-December as ICO activity slowed. Today, MetaDAO’s ICOs remain stable, placing more weight on the quality of the founders, reliability and long-term reconciliation than simply increasing the number of launches. This strategy was necessary to ensure sales, but it has come with a clear trade-off: Without a steady stream of new launches, it is difficult for money to increase, and MetaDAO has almost collapsed over the past few weeks.
The chart below shows why. Token volumes tend to be high around TGE and the following days, meaning that Futarchy AMM’s stable volumes, and by extension, earnings, are highly dependent on new launches coming through the pipeline.

Despite the decrease in daily income, META has performed very well, collecting almost 40% in the last week. As a result, META’s trailing 30-day P/S has risen to ~36x, up from the previous two months of ~10-15x.

Markets are looking ahead, however, and I expect META’s P/S to return to historic levels in the coming weeks and months as earnings increase (ie, not through lower prices, but through higher earnings).
The resources that are about to expire are two. The first is Ranger’s ICO, which will likely be oversubscribed and lead to an increase in Futarchy AMM post-TGE volumes. The second is A request to allwhich passed last night and will
Over the next few days and months to come, I expect MetaDAO’s revenue to increase as more and more active startups gather momentum. Two aids stand out: the unauthorized installation and the STAMP of the Colosseum.
MetaDAO has been debated in public forums as to whether to maintain a licensed (permitted) model or attempt to launch without permission. The latter, despite the low risk of projects, is an important test to increase the number of products and ensure the scalability of the platform, and it is probably the way that the team will follow.
In conclusion, I think the market is underestimating what Colosseum’s STAMP could mean for MetaDAO. Colosseum hosts Solana’s startup portfolio, hackathons, accelerators and funding. Many leading environmental groups follow hackathons (eg Jito, Kamino, Drift, Exponent, Hylo). STAMP effectively integrates MetaDAO into that process, creating a stable pipeline set up at the highest level to support unlicensed ICOs and improve stability over time.

Finally, Ranger and the Omnibus proposal may help speed up funding in the near future, but the unlicensed implementation of STAMP is what will lead to a tenfold increase in MetaDAO’s ICO cadence (and, by extension, volume and income) in the coming months.
Get news in your inbox. Check out the Blockworks blog posts: