Author
Ahmed Barakat
Author
Share it
The total valuation of Hyperliquid reached Solana, $ 50 billion to $ 56 billion, and the margin, although small, is the way the market says that the balance has changed.
The HYPE token is trading at $58.60, up 20% in 24 hours, while SOL gained 2.20% in the same period.
This variation in daily routines is not noise. With the words of guidance from the investors for the last 18 months watching the Perp DEX built on the Mainnet dispel the assumption that multi-purpose L1s are the ones that explain the money.
Hyperliquid didn’t get here by accident. It launched the L1 designed with the intention of preparing for the temporary future, it attracted the attention of the institutions and completed for the second minute, then it prepared its economy to return the real money of the protocol, on the yield that is increasing Solana’s liquid derivatives by spreading the meaning.
Note: The best crypto to change your profile
Perp DEX Dominance: How the Hyperliquid Payment Engine Works, and Why DeFi Liquidity Concentration Is a Real Issue
Hyperliquid is not a chained DEX for general purpose. It operates on its own L1, designed to create frequent outbound products, with a fee of 0.045% and a producer fee of 0.015% for perpetuity, which is below what most central sites charge and is designed to attract professional travelers rather than commercial customers.
The result is a payment engine that has started generating numbers that force direct comparisons with Solana on the chain.
Data shows that Hyperliquid surpassed Solana in 7-day sales, $12.6 million against Solana’s $11.8 million, a crossover that would have been dismissed as impossible 12 months ago.
Artemis data sets The known volume of Hyperliquid in 2025 at $ 26 trillion, rising to a level that has compressed the years of adoption of DeFi into one cycle.
That number is important because it shows that DeFi liquidity on Hyperliquid is working and making payments, not money sitting in harvest farms waiting to come out.
Solana vs. Hyperliquid: Where Each Chain Stands Against Another
FDV integration is true, but this comparison is not the same for Hyperliquid in any region. Solana’s quality is consistent and deep.
The chain handles consumer services, memecoins, payments, and NFT stability at a level Hyperliquid has never seen before. Visa, PayPal, and Stripe are all based on Solanaa fact that speaks to the prevalence of institutional integration that the derivative-first chain cannot repeat in the near future.
Amundi, the largest asset manager in Europe, has moved to Solana and discussed the same as Ethereum and Bitcoin. a story based on children represents the main method that is independent of who wins the perps volume competition.
The number of developers, the distribution of licenses, and the diversity of consumer programs all favor Solana with limits.
The background is not the same as Hyperliquid, however. Its stable L1 model makes it possible to maintain a fixed risk if the default opinion turns or a competitor’s position exits at a lower price, Hyperliquid’s moat is smaller than Solana’s in terms of production.
Jupiter and Drift on Solana didn’t stop, and Solana’s money has improved because the business is now a battleground for the chain.
What is created in the distribution of money is that this is increasingly betting. Solana is an organic game based on payments, shopping programs, and the most competitive L1 environment.
Hyperliquid is a decentralized betting platform that plays a major role in the most advanced DeFi transactions. Both can be correct at the same time. They are not playing the same game.
Note: The best deals before the sale starts
