HyperLiquid (HYPE) price it has corrected almost 20% from its recent high near $69, falling back to $60 despite what initially appeared to be a corrective development. Earlier this week, the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP met with the US SEC to discuss the future of crypto regulations in the United States, a development that briefly removed the speculation surrounding the token.
Instead of extending its recovery, HYPE has been forced to sell again. At the same time, on-chain data shows major owners are transferring hundreds of thousands of HYPE to the central exchange, reinforcing fears of distribution after a strong rally for many months of the token. With the price approaching the key support of $50-$51, traders are asking a more important question than why the HYPE is falling: Is this the kind of capitulation that is usually on the bottom, or does the current price increase the difficulty of a deeper correction to $40?
HyperLiquid Whale Outflows Increase Distribution Complaints
One of the major contributors to the recent HYPE boom is the large-scale migration of whales to intermediate countries. On-chain data shows a lot of value activity in the last 24 hours, with wallets moving more than 437,000 HYPE (worth about $28.4 million) on exchanges including OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io.
Multiple transfers exceeded 100,000 HYPE, reinforcing concerns that major shareholders could lock in profits after HyperLiquid’s strong rally over the past few months. Although the exchange entry does not guarantee a quick sale, it often increases the caution of the market because tokens that move to trading platforms are more likely to be sold than those that remain in private wallets.
Is HyperLiquid Entering Capitulation Phase?
HyperLiquid’s weekly chart shows current sales and measures a large change rather than confirming a long-term trend. After failing to break above $68, HYPE has returned to the $50-$51 support zone, where the upward trend intersects with the previous level. Although it is about 20% off its recent high, the broader market is still supportive.
The RSI is recovering from the highs and remains above the 50 neutral level. This shows that the bullishness has slowed down but has not yet moved in favor of the sellers. Meanwhile, the CMF remains positive, indicating that outflows have slowed despite the recent recession. Trading volume remained subdued, rather than showing the highs associated with panic-driven closings.
Together, these indicators mean that the current correction is equivalent to taking profits within a stable channel, although a definite break below $50 would weaken this view and suggest a HYPE correction deep into the $40 support area.
Important Observational Standards
- Immediate Resistance: $60 to $62
- Big Rejection: $68 to $70
- Recent Support: $50 to $51
- Big Help: $40 to $42
- Bullish Invalidity: Confirmed close below $50
- Bearish disapproval: A move above $70
Is HyperLiquid Control Over?
HyperLiquid’s recent decline appears to be driven by a combination of whale profits, weak momentum, and market stress rather than a breakdown in its fundamentals. Although the big change from the main owners accelerated the selling, the long-term chart still shows HYPE trading above its long-term trend, maintaining a bullish trend.
Meanwhile, the $50-$51 support zone remains the most important area to watch for Hyperliquid (HYPE) price rallies. A winning defense could signal this correction as a healthy recovery within the broader trend and pave the way for a recovery to the $68-$70 resistance zone. However, a definite break below $50 would disrupt the current order and increase the chance of a deeper correction to $40.
Until all the action is over, traders should focus less on whale heads and more information like price, volume, and derivatives begin to prove true fatigue among traders.
Was this post helpful?
Story Ends Here
Trust CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been providing accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our team of expert researchers and journalists, following strict Editorial guidelines based on EEAT (Effectiveness, Expertise, Validity, Trustworthiness). Each article is checked against a reputable site to ensure accuracy, transparency, and credibility. Our review policy ensures an unbiased review when we develop exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates on everything crypto & blockchain, from startups to industry executives.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and information shared represent the author’s opinion on market conditions. Please do your own research before making any financial decisions. Neither the author nor the publisher is responsible for your financial decisions.
Offers and Promotions:
Sponsored content and affiliate links can be viewed on our website. Advertisements are clearly identifiable, and our content is not independent of our advertisers.
Read the Next Article
