Author
Ahmed Barakat
Author
Share it
XRP News: Ripple has nine days to file the final draft of the Digital Financial Assets Law and Department of California of Financial Protection and Innovation, and as of the most recent documents until March 2026, no Ripple group is present on the DFPI list of DFAL applicants.
The company participated in the DFPI earlier this year, mentioning the July 1 deadline by name in the written statement. Public records do not show the last booking to match the current situation.
Differentiation is needed systematically. July 1st is not a regulatory deadline or compliance window, it is the California state’s set date for issuing crypto licenses under the Digital Financial Assets Law, and the issuance of the port requires he finished work on a file, not a buffer.
For Ripple, the immediate consequences apply: without a document sent or a valid authorization, RLUSD cannot be issued, redeemed, or legally deposited to California residents after that date. California is the fifth richest state in the world. This is not a circular market.
Find out: The Best Trading Signals
DFAL Explained: What the July 1 Deadline Really Means
Digital Financial Assets Law California law was enacted under AB 39 and later amended.
The permit issuance date was pushed back from July 1, 2025 to July 1, 2026 by AB 1934, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2024, a delay that was clearly established as a way to coordinate with regulators and businesses to build infrastructure. This option closes on July 1, 2026.
DFPI began accepting DFAL programs through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System on March 9, 2026. The policy prohibits any entity from engaging in, or even pretending to engage in, commercial digital marketing activities with California residents unless it is licensed, has a completed application on file, or qualifies for a special exemption.
The “waiting” language is broad: marketing materials, program availability, and websites offered to Californians may be initiated by DFAL prior to a single application.
The following price is not small. The DFAL application fee is $7,500 plus the DFPI review fee, and the final filing must include company records, finances, AML and CTF programs, controls, data protection policies, and consumer protection disclosures.
Companies that miss the deadline and continue to serve California residents face cease and desist orders, civil penalties, and exposure under the California Financial Code, enforcement tools that DFPI has the power to deploy.
For RLUSD in particular, the functions of overlaying, issuing, redeeming, and storing, are the core of Ripple’s stablecoin business. There’s no way to track it down here. The federal-level crypto regulatory calendar it is adding further pressure to companies that already have multiple responsibilities at the same time.
XRP News: Ripple Engaged DFPI, But No License Application on Public Record
The difference between Ripple’s performance and its proven track record is what drives this issue. Ripple submitted written comments to DFPI in early 2026, addressed to DFPI Legal Coordinator Diana Pha.
In the letter, the company confirmed that it understood the July 1 deadline, expressed support for DFAL’s plan, and requested changes to Section 80.3002(a)(5) of the proposed regulations – requesting that each entity holding a DFAL license be clearly defined under this section, and removing the requirement to maintain a Special Funding License.
This principle is understandable. Ripple currently has more than 40 remittance licenses in the United States and is listed as a trusted trust company by the New York Department of Financial Services, which directly manages RLUSD.
Ripple’s position, that DFAL’s background checks and standards management are often more complex than standard MTL, making dual certification obsolete, shows the kind of action from a company that understands what it’s writing about.
The problem is that taking action in the implementation of the law and giving the final approval are two different activities.
XRP expert WrathofKahneman pointed out this discrepancy on June 19, 2026, noting that the public records of DFPI until March 2026 do not list any Ripple group among the DFAL applicants. His work generated 13,487 views and 88 posts.
WrathofKahneman was careful to note that not appearing in the public ledger does not guarantee that Ripple has not been issued, the records are not publicly visible, and that the work requires that Ripple directly do DFPI. That is the correct epistemic position. What the record shows is awareness and participation in policy making. What it didn’t show was the completion of the work.
Note: The best crypto to change your profile
