If you’ve ever seen the headlines that the President sat down with lawmakers to repeal the CLARITY Act, what he said was correct, and then the story went on without it. Trump intervened directly. He did approve language that stalled the bill for several months. And just one week later, the Senate Majority Leader was telling the press that the bill would not pass before August.
This gap between “the White House is now involved” and “the bill is about to become law” is all the talk right now, and it’s important to get it right before you make a deal.
What exactly did Trump do?
On July 16, Trump met with a group of Republican senators in the Oval Office: Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Bernie Moreno of Ohio, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Bill Hagerty of Tennessee. Also present were White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt, chief of staff Susie Wiles and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. No Democrats were invited.
This was the deepest impact the branch had ever seen. His goal was modest: to resolve the dispute over the moral code, which was the one thing that remained unresolved after months of negotiations.
A few days later, the President signed the official language. On July 22, Senate Republicans published a revised document that runs several hundred pages. For the first time, the documents included restrictions on how a sitting president could benefit from the digital economy. The president, vice president, members of Congress, federal judges and other covered officials are prohibited from issuing or supporting digital assets for payment while in office.
On the face of it, this was the concession that Democrats have been seeking since the spring. It didn’t come to that.
Why did the Democrats reject cultural language?
A few hours after the announcement, Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona, one of only two Democrats who voted for the Senate Banking Committee, dismissed the Republican memo as wrongly unpublishable, saying it was not serious and failed. He said he is working against Tillis and unnamed Republicans, and the battle is far from over.
The main dispute is about the scope and timing rather than the existence of the decision. Democrats want limited, institutionalized trading of crypto executives. Republicans have drawn up restrictions that critics describe as more limited and short-lived than originally requested. Democrats made social policy important to their votes; Republicans consider the issue answered. Both positions are on record, and neither side has moved since.
This issue is important here because this has become a strong point. Trump’s annual financial disclosure also reported more than $1.4 billion in crypto-related earnings in 2025, including about $635 million in meme fees and around $515 million linked to the sale of the World Liberty Financial brand. Trump has denied any wrongdoing related to his digital businesses. Democratic critics say the new regulatory framework should not pass without the president’s self-imposed restrictions on the businesses he controls. Supporters argue that mergers and acquisitions laws against single-party ownership have hurt business throughout the year due to legal uncertainty.
What is the actual vote count?
This is where hope ends, and it has nothing to do with who is morally right.
The bill needs 60 votes in the Senate to pass. Republicans have 53 seats. Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul are expected to vote no on major issues, which puts the active Republican base at around 51. This means that about nine Democratic votes are needed.
Only two Democrats, Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, voted against the bill in committee, and both cautioned that committee support does not guarantee a floor vote. Meanwhile, Senators Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen and Jeff Merkley have come out in opposition.
Nine votes from the caucus when the two most aggrieved members are publicly dissatisfied is not a big deal. This is why many experts expect the deal to come before the bottom period, not after.
What exactly did Thune say, and does it solve it?
Asked Thursday if the Senate could end the CLARITY Act and a separate college sports bill before the recess, Majority Leader John Thune said he doesn’t think it will, adding that he wants CLARITY to start and see where the votes go.
Read carefully, because the two sections point in different directions. “Start” means opening a dispute without finalizing it, which will leave the money in the middle of September. That’s not the same as the bill’s death, but it means burning up some floor time in a fall calendar that’s already full of middle-of-the-road politics. Thune’s office has cited Russia’s sanctions relief bill as a short-term priority.
Not everyone agrees with that reading. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt said he was surprised by Thune’s assessment and remains somewhat optimistic, saying the first week of August is still a possibility and pushing for a vote instead of waiting forever for a Democratic signature. Senator John Kennedy has made his side clear: without a favorable vote before the break, he hopes the odds will change.
The break starts around 7 August.
Where has the luck gone?
Prediction markets tell the story more neatly than the media.
Polymarket price of 2026 section at 82% in February. It was close to 48% three weeks ago. After Thune’s comments it fell to around 37%. Galaxy Research, which had 75% in May, dropped to 50% and then to 30%. Kalshi’s businessmen had earlier passed the Senate’s vote before the 79% chance of passing only 36% for the bill to become law this year. This spread attracted many headlines that were not missed.
Institutional forecasts have been bleak. Stifel’s Washington Strategist wrote that the bill should clear the Senate by the end of July, and that the lack of a recess could cause its hopes to be dashed. Beacon Policy Advisors says a miss could end the 2026 process altogether. Lummis warned that the delay could push market regulations back years.
Is moral struggle the only obstacle?
No, and this is understated.
The second front opened on the stablecoin yield. Banking groups are pushing back on features they say would allow stablecoin trading to bring in money from community lenders. Senator John Cornyn has said this publicly, and Senator John Curtis said he will answer the local question. to borrow power to Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott.
This is important because it is a rejection of Republicans, for economic reasons rather than cultural ones, in a room where many cannot afford it.
What to know on the side: 18 July is one year from the GENIUS Act, and the deadline for federal agencies to complete the implementation of stablecoin regulations that were passed without a single final law. The regulatory machinery for the US digital economy is moving more slowly than the announcements suggest across the board.
What does this mean if you sell or build?
For traders, the advantage is that the CLARITY column is not guaranteed in price and has not been around for several weeks. Anyone who is on the administrative support should work from about one-third, not on the subject of the White House meeting. Citi cut its Bitcoin and Ethereum Targets at the beginning of July in part due to the persistence of uncertainty in the administration of the administration of the administration of the administration.
For developers and companies looking at the US, the situation continues: oversight is divided between the SEC and the CFTC on a case-by-case basis, and is an organizational structure rather than an active law. That appearance is a flexible choice, not a rule, and this is what the driver needs to close.
For everyone else, the next question is simple. If the Senate begins to debate before 7 August, September is alive. If nothing gets started, the clear window moves past mid-November, and the Congressional campaign on some issues is not one that gets enough time for a 600-page bill.
It’s clear that you can already use it While the US rules are still in place, EU investors are already trading under MiCA. Bitpanda is licensed in the European Union and offers crypto, stocks and ETFs from a single account. Sign in with the code CRYPTOTICKER images to start with a € 25 welcome bonus, get a 5% cashback in EURCV on your transfer, and get one entry in the offer of 3 BTC for every eligible crypto euro you transfer. . 👉 Open a Bitpanda account
The CLARITY Act has reached further than any other crypto market bill in US history: it passed the House 294-134 in July 2025, cleared the Senate Banking 15-9 in May 2026, placed on the Senate calendar, and now supported by the direct involvement of the president. Nine votes short of the chamber leaving town in two weeks. All of these things are true at the same time, and only one is making headlines.
